Justia 10 - Badge
Super Lawyers - Badge
Avvo 10 / Top Attorney - Badge
Massachusetts Bar Association 1911 - Badge
Top Rated Lawyer 2023 - Badge

Leaving the Scene of an Accident

Leaving the scene of an accident in Massachusetts is another of the many crimes set out in Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 90 Section 24. The statute is virtually non-comprehensible and extremely difficult for a lay person to read. As to leaving the scene, there are essentially three crimes for which you can be charged, each of which his significant differences in terms of proof and potential penalty.

1.- Leaving the Scene of Property Damage

The law states that if you get into an accident, whether with another car or some other type of property and you fail to make known your name, address and vehicle registration you are guilty of a crime. To sustain a conviction of this offense the prosecutor must prove five things beyond a reasonable doubt. 1) that you operated a motor vehicle, 2) that it was on a public way, 3) that during the course of such operation you collided with or injured in some way another vehicle or property, 4) that you knew that you had done so and 5) that after doing so you failed to stop, give your name, home address and the registration number of your car.

Penalty:
Fine of $20 to $200
Jail sentence for between 2 weeks and 2 years

2.- Leaving the Scene of Personal Injury Not Resulting in Death

The law pertaining to this crime is virtually identical to leaving the scene of property damage except that it adds the element of causing injury to another person.

Penalty:
Fine of $500 to $1,000
Jail sentence for between 6 months and 2 years

3.- Leaving the Scene of Personal Injury Resulting in Death

Again, this crime has similar elements to the two crimes referenced above. The significant difference is that that accident her results in the death of another person and that the defendant must have left the scene in order “to avoid prosecution or evade apprehension”. This is a felony. Massachusetts district courts do not have jurisdiction over this crime.

Penalty:
Fine of $1,000 to $5,000
State prison sentence of 2 ½ to 10 years or jail for 1 to 2 ½ years There is a minimum mandatory 1 year sentence that must be served

This statute was enacted to enable anyone who was injured or whose property was damaged to a motor vehicle to get immediate and accurate information about the driver of the other vehicle. Your obligations under this statute are not satisfied by stopping at a remote place or being passively willing to answer questions. The statute imposes on you an affirmative duty to stop and make known the pertinent information.

The statute was created for another reason as well. People who operate motor vehicle while intoxicated have a tendency to flee after an accident to avoid prosecution. Most judges and prosecutors suspect that people who leave the scene of an accident without stopping and making themselves known did so because they should not have been driving. Thus, even though you might avoid the consequence of a drunk driving prosecution you are still looking at a severe penalty. Keep this in mind as well. The registry will take your license if you are convicted of leaving the scene after property damage, personal injury or death.

Case Results » Leaving the Scene of an Accident

Not Guilty Verdict for Nursing School Student Charged With Leaving the Scene of an Accident With Bodily Injury January 15, 2025 Nearly two years ago a woman was walking down a quiet street around 6:30 in the morning. This was a part of her daily routine. On the day of this incident, the woman was struck by a car and run over by both the front driver’s side tires and the back driver’s side tires. The incident was captured by a neighboring ring camera video. The investigating police detective discerned that the vehicle was a particular make and model. He conducted a CJIS query and located what he believed to be the vehicle registered to an address seconds away from the crime scene. The detective went to the home and observed the vehicle in the driveway. He then met with our client, a young nursing student who was working that day. She admitted to driving that car on the route where the woman was injured at the same time as the incident. She was subsequently charged with leaving the scene of an accident with bodily injury in violation of G.L. c. 90 section 24. Attorney Neyman was hired. After two years of investigation and trial preparation the case went to trial. Today, our client was found not guilty of the charge. Read More in Motor Vehicle Crimes

Motor Vehicle Crime Charges Dismissed April 1, 2020 The defendant is charged with leaving the scene of an accident with property damage under G.L. c. 90 section 24. He retained our office months after being charged. We understood that our client never had a clerk magistrate hearing under G.L. c. 218 section 35. Once we made that clear to the judge we moved for a dismissal of the charges. The judge allowed our motion even though the district attorney objected. This case was determined telephonically due to the courts being closed Read More in Clerk Magistrate Hearings

Charges of Leaving the Scene With Property Damage Do Not Issue After Clerk Magistrate Hearing-1 January 8, 2020 The defendant lives in a high income Boston suburb. On September 27, 2019 police in his town received an OnStar call alerting them to an accident severe enough to deploy airbags. The officers responded and found a mailbox had been knocked over. The OnStar operator identified the owner of the vehicle and his address. The officers went to the address and tried to make contact with the occupants. Noises, including voices within the home were heard by the police. Through a window they observed one of the home occupants on a stairwell. The police illuminated the garage with their flashlights and observed the vehicle, damaged and with deployed airbags. The next day officers contact the car owner. Their recorded conversation with the man matched the OnStar recording. Accordingly, charges of leaving the scene with property damage under G.L. c. 90 Section 24 were applied for. Attorney Neyman was retained to represent the defendant at the clerk magistrate hearing, G.L. c. 218 Section 35. After the hearing, we convinced the clerk magistrate not to issue the complaint. No charges will issue. Read More in Clerk Magistrate Hearings

Location

Boston Office
10 Tremont St #602

Boston, MA 02108

Phone: 617-263-6800 Fax: 888-266-1781

Client Reviews

We went to trial and won. He saved me fifteen years mandatory in state prison for this case.

A.C.

I hired him and he got the case dismissed before I had to go into a courtroom. My school never found out and if they had I would have lost my academic scholarships. He really saved my college career.

Melissa C. Cold

My union rep told me to call Steve Neyman. From the get go I felt comfortable with him. He took the time to talk to me about my case whenever I needed .... He even gave me his personal cell number and took all my calls. We won the case and I kept my job.

Bart L. S.

The best criminal defense lawyer in Massachusetts. Takes all of his client's calls at any time of the day or night. He was always there for me and my family. Steve saved my life.

Jacquille D. Brockton

In less than two months Stephen Neyman got my old conviction vacated. I now have no criminal record.

Paul W. Boston

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Available 24/7
  3. 3 Over 20 Years of Experience

Fill out the contact form or call us at 617-263-6800 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message